![\"Summer](\"https:\/\/auto.inform.com.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/post-172283-624f295f76403.webp\")
<\/a><\/p>\nAnd the first model that opens our rating for the year is the Japanese Yokohama tire. It can be noted as a good rubber for effective grip and reliable handling on wet surfaces, which brought it to tenth place in our ranking. It definitely has problems with hydroplaning protection, so accelerating in the rain is not the best idea. In general, directional stability sometimes suffers at speed, so keep that in mind. On dry pavement, it is not as good as on wet pavement, and shows average results – the braking distance is quite long, the handling on a winding track leaves much to be desired. It overcomes obstacles quite quietly and smoothly and saves fuel well – and this is a definite plus.<\/p>\n
At the time of preparation of the material, the average price for a Yokohama Blue Art RV 02 to 17 tire in our country is 7,400 rubles.<\/p>\n
Pros<\/strong>:<\/p>\n Cons<\/strong>:<\/p>\n A model from Nexen jumped to ninth place. It stands out for its good, albeit not outstanding, stability of performance when it comes to rain. On wet surfaces, her situation is much better – here you have good braking, adequate handling, and good lateral properties. If we take these indicators as a reference point, then dry coverage can be called its weak point: the braking distance is too long and it has problems with the clarity of the steering response. Another disadvantage can be considered resistance to aquaplaning, as well as weak rolling resistance. Of the unequivocal advantages – the move is very soft.<\/p>\n At the time of preparation of the material, you can buy Nexen N Fera Ru 1 tires in our country for an average of 7,350 rubles.<\/p>\n Pros<\/strong>:<\/p>\n Cons<\/strong>:<\/p>\n Tires from the Korean company Kumho are located on the line above. They are worth paying attention to because of their decent traction, maneuverability on wet surfaces and reliable protection against aquaplaning. On a dry canvas, everything is rather mediocre – average handling and rather weak braking. Course stability is also lacking stars from the sky. They definitely cannot be called economical – the rolling resistance is clearly above average, which does not allow reducing fuel consumption.<\/p>\n At the time of this article, the average price of a Kumho Krugen HP 91×17 tire in our country is 7,400 rubles.<\/p>\n Pros<\/strong>:<\/p>\n Cons<\/strong>:<\/p>\n The seventh line of the ranking of summer tires for SUVs was left for the tire from Goodyear. She showed herself remarkably well on dry surfaces: grip is quite decent, control is very simple, responsive and extremely reliable. In what she loses to other participants is a wet surface, where her characteristics are close to the average level, although she is very good in terms of transverse grip properties. Hydroplaning resistance does not add optimism – the risk that the car succumbs to this unpleasant effect when driving in the rain is quite significant. Another problem is the unintelligible smoothness of the ride. Of the pluses, we note low rolling resistance – to the envy of many.<\/p>\n At the time of preparing the rating, you can buy Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 tires with a diameter of 17 inches in our country for an average of 8,400 rubles.<\/p>\n Pros<\/strong>:<\/p>\n Cons<\/strong>:<\/p>\n The Hankook model sits solidly in sixth place in the SUV summer tire rankings for its good dry handling results, but at the same time it has rather mediocre braking performance. During the rain, there are problems with the steering response, but the tires brake very effectively on wet pavement. Such a strange spread in performance is accompanied by low rolling resistance – the Ventus S1 evo2 SUV tire reduces fuel consumption, which may be of interest to economical drivers. Its directional stability is pretty decent, as well as a quiet, smooth ride.<\/p>\n At the time of this writing, you can buy Hankook Ventus C 1 evo 2 SUV tires for 17 in our country for an average of 8,200 rubles.<\/p>\n Pros<\/strong>:<\/p>\n Cons<\/strong>:<\/p>\n Maxis is usually classified as a budget tire category, but this is completely unnoticeable if you pay attention to the grip properties. We put them in the middle of the ranking for SUVs for good performance and a very affordable price. It is better to use them on dry surfaces – here they are simply invincible. On off-road and dry pavement, they pass all obstacles on a winding track very easily and efficiently. In the rain, control problems begin, they slow down rather mediocrely. Surprisingly, the Victra Sport 5 SUV shows almost the best hydroplaning protection in wet conditions.<\/p>\n At the time of preparation of the material, Maxis Viktra Sport 5 SUV for 17 in our country will cost an average of 6,000 rubles.<\/p>\n Pros<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n
\n
9 Nexen N Fera RU1<\/h2>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n\n
\n
8 Kumho Crugen HP 91<\/h2>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n\n
\n
7 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3<\/h2>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n\n
\n
6 Hankook K117A (Ventus S1 evo2 SUV)<\/h2>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n\n
\n
5 Maxxis Victra Sport 5 SUV<\/h2>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n\n